During a recent government meeting, council members expressed significant concerns regarding a proposed telehealth grant initiative aimed at addressing the opioid crisis in Marlborough County. The discussions revealed a series of red flags surrounding the telehealth company pitching the grant, particularly regarding the urgency and manner in which funding was requested.

One council member highlighted the abrupt change in a two-day deadline for funding, which was extended without clear communication. The member criticized the request for a $10,000 wire transfer to an unfamiliar grant writer, suggesting that such a financial transaction was unorthodox and raised suspicions about the legitimacy of the proposal. The council member emphasized that no local entity typically operates in this manner, indicating a lack of trust in the process.

Another council member defended the county's own grant writer, who has a proven track record of securing substantial funding for various projects. They argued that it would be more prudent to utilize local expertise rather than outsourcing to an unknown individual, especially given the successful history of the county's grant writer in obtaining funds.

The conversation also touched on the broader issue of the opioid crisis, with members acknowledging the urgent need for effective solutions. However, they stressed the importance of a careful and transparent approach to securing funding, ensuring that any financial commitments made are in the best interest of the county and its residents.

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that the council was not opposed to seeking help for the opioid crisis but was wary of the proposed method and the individuals involved. Ultimately, a motion was made to table the discussion, allowing for further investigation into the grant proposal and the parties involved before any decisions are made. The council members reiterated their commitment to addressing the opioid crisis while ensuring due diligence in the funding process.