In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the implications of a proposed project that has garnered significant public attention, particularly from environmental groups. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was highlighted, noting that while it does not mandate written responses to every public comment, the agency has made efforts to address concerns raised.

The Sierra Club presented an online petition with 1,187 signatures from individuals opposing the project, citing inadequacies in air quality assessments and potential violations of federal regulatory standards. They argue that the project could prolong oil and gas production, raising environmental concerns. In response, officials asserted that they have adequately addressed these comments and deemed the criticisms as inaccurate.

Support for the project was also noted, with endorsements from the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in Kern County and Kern Tax. Staff evaluations indicated that the project meets zoning ordinance requirements, ensuring compatibility with existing oilfield operations and safety for nearby communities, schools, and private properties.

The staff recommended approval of the project, supported by findings of fact and a statement of overriding considerations, which outline the project's benefits despite its significant environmental impacts. The final recirculated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) acknowledged that, even after implementing mitigation measures, some impacts remain significant. However, officials emphasized that the board has the authority to weigh the project's social and economic benefits against these unavoidable impacts.