In a tense government meeting, Supervisor Prisz announced that the District Attorney's office had arrived with a warrant to search his office, prompting an unexpected interruption. Prisz expressed regret for the disruption, stating he needed to address the situation immediately. He alleged that the warrant was orchestrated by David Brus, a former employee of Supervisor David Couch, claiming Brus was acting as a political and business partner of Couch to facilitate the search.

The meeting quickly shifted focus as Prisz denied any business relationship with Brus, asserting that the allegations were false. The discussion raised concerns about the meeting's quorum, as only three supervisors were present, which could impact decision-making.

As the meeting continued, Chairman Couch sought to clarify a previous misunderstanding regarding requests made by various groups, emphasizing the need for clear communication. The atmosphere remained charged as attendees were encouraged to approach the microphone for public comments, highlighting the ongoing tensions surrounding the meeting's proceedings.

This incident underscores the complexities of local governance and the potential for political maneuvering, particularly in the lead-up to elections.