During a recent government meeting, a local resident raised concerns regarding the handling of a hazardous tree situation that resulted in damage to his property. The resident, who owns a duplex at the intersection of 37th and D Street, described an incident where a large limb from a city-owned hackberry tree fell onto his roof, causing significant damage.

The resident explained that he had alerted the city’s forestry department about the tree's deteriorating condition after a city crew was seen painting lines for a nearby school. Despite his prompt notification, the limb fell before the scheduled removal, leading to a denied insurance claim due to the perceived delay in action by the city.

He emphasized that the temporary sidewalk closures implemented by the city were inadequate, posing a risk to public safety, particularly for children who might access the area. The resident expressed frustration over the city’s policy, which he claimed did not sufficiently protect him or the public from potential hazards posed by the tree.

The city’s assistant attorney clarified that the Parks Department has a longstanding policy of not removing debris from private property, placing the responsibility on property owners when city trees cause damage. This policy was reiterated during the meeting, highlighting the complexities surrounding liability and maintenance of city trees.

The resident is now seeking compensation for the cost of removing the remaining limb that hangs over the sidewalk, which he believes is the city's responsibility. He presented photographs of the damage and the tree limb in question, illustrating the precarious situation that remains unresolved.

The discussion underscored ongoing concerns about urban tree management and the responsibilities of city departments in ensuring public safety while addressing property owner liabilities. The council members present did not pose further questions, leaving the resident's claims and concerns to be addressed in future discussions.