During a recent government meeting, concerns regarding the proposed firing range were addressed, with officials clarifying misconceptions surrounding its planning and location. A representative emphasized that the property in question was never included in the original land trust conveyance, countering claims that it had been removed and re-added during discussions.

The representative acknowledged the community's apprehension, noting that regardless of where the firing range is situated, local residents will likely oppose it due to proximity. However, they pointed out that city residents are restricted from discharging firearms on their properties, while those living near the proposed site could legally establish private shooting ranges without city intervention.

Notably, the representative highlighted that no city residents had voiced opposition to the firing range at the meeting, suggesting that the concerns raised were primarily from those outside the city limits. They urged the community to consider the broader implications of the facility, asserting that if built to safety standards, it could serve a beneficial purpose.

The discussion also touched on the need for training for emergency services, with the representative expressing openness to reviewing the firing range proposal further. However, they questioned the validity of a $3 million cost estimate for the facility, indicating that more clarity is needed on financial implications.

As the meeting concluded, officials acknowledged the complexity of the decision-making process and the necessity of balancing community concerns with the operational needs of city services.