In a heated government meeting, board members expressed significant discontent over the selection process for a new candidate to fill a recent vacancy. The discussions revealed a divide among members regarding the appropriateness of the chosen candidate, with some arguing that the decision was being forced upon them despite having six other candidates who were deemed more acceptable.

One board member voiced frustration, stating, \"This is not how we're supposed to work as a bipartisan board of education,\" urging colleagues to reconsider their choice. The sentiment was echoed by others who felt that the process lacked transparency and collaboration. Tensions escalated as members debated the qualifications of the selected candidate, with one member insisting that it was inappropriate to discuss these qualifications publicly.

The meeting also highlighted communication issues, with accusations of members not returning calls or engaging in discussions prior to the meeting. One member pointed out that they had made efforts to reach out, while another countered that they had not received any communication except from one individual.

As the meeting progressed, the urgency to fill the vacancy was emphasized, with members acknowledging the need for a swift resolution to avoid further disruption to the school system. The board is expected to vote soon, as they aim to finalize the appointment and move forward with their responsibilities.