During a recent city council meeting, community activists voiced strong opposition to the proposed implementation of ShotSpotter technology in Tacoma, citing concerns over its implications for local policing and broader geopolitical issues. Activists argued that the technology represents a form of oppression against vulnerable populations, particularly the homeless community, and is linked to Israel, which has been labeled an apartheid regime by the International Court of Justice.

The speakers demanded that the city council not only reject ShotSpotter but also divest from Israel and strengthen a ceasefire resolution to include an arms embargo. They criticized the city manager, Elizabeth Polly, for applying for the grant to implement ShotSpotter independently, claiming this undermines democratic accountability within the city’s governance structure.

Critics of the city manager position contended that it operates like a business, prioritizing profit over the needs and safety of Tacoma residents. They expressed frustration over the perceived lack of accountability, arguing that the city council's reliance on the city manager allows for unchecked executive power that harms the community.

The activists emphasized that taxpayer dollars should not be used to support technologies that contribute to violence and oppression, asserting that the implementation of ShotSpotter would exacerbate existing issues within the community. The meeting highlighted a growing discontent among residents regarding the direction of local governance and the prioritization of corporate interests over community welfare.