During a recent city commission meeting, concerns were raised regarding a proposed development project aimed at addressing the affordable housing crisis. Several residents expressed their discontent, highlighting issues related to community integration, safety, and the adequacy of the proposed housing units.

One commissioner voiced frustration over the limited accessibility of the new units for current residents, emphasizing that city resources were being allocated to projects that did not benefit those in need within the community. The commissioner questioned the effectiveness of the open application process, suggesting it favored outsiders rather than assisting local residents who require support.

Residents from the Foxcroft Condominium Apartments voiced strong opposition to the development, arguing that it would not serve their community's needs. Sheryl Ann Mullins Black, a long-term resident, criticized the lack of engagement from the developer and raised concerns about the potential negative impacts on property values, safety, and traffic congestion. She pointed out that the proposed rental units would not provide ownership opportunities for current residents, further exacerbating the community's challenges.

Another resident, Avril K Sherazard, called for a thorough review of the project's foundation, questioning the appropriateness of the density bonus being applied to a fully affordable building. She urged the commission to delay any decisions until a comprehensive traffic study could be conducted, given the existing strain on local infrastructure.

Joy Marshall echoed these sentiments, expressing dissatisfaction with the community appearance board's oversight and the potential safety risks associated with the influx of low-income residents. She urged commissioners to familiarize themselves with the neighborhood before making decisions that could significantly impact its character and safety.

As the meeting progressed, the commission voted to extend the session to allow for further public input, reflecting the community's strong desire for a more inclusive and thoughtful approach to development. The discussions underscored the ongoing tension between the need for affordable housing and the concerns of existing residents about the implications of such projects on their community.