In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the appointment of an interim County administrator, particularly focusing on the potential candidate, Ben Wetmore. The meeting featured public comments that highlighted apprehensions about Wetmore's qualifications and political affiliations, as well as the board's decision-making process.

One speaker, Chantal Martineau from Herc Township, questioned the urgency of appointing an interim administrator just days before a scheduled board meeting. She criticized the board for not initiating a search for a new administrator following the resignation of the previous administrator, John Anderson, who had accepted a contract to continue in his role before ultimately deciding to resign. Martineau expressed concerns about the implications of allowing a deputy to submit a resignation in the absence of their superior.

Dan Zimmer from Port Shelton Township articulated three main reasons against Wetmore's appointment. He pointed to the board's controversial history, suggesting that appointing Wetmore could lead to legal complications, especially in light of ongoing lawsuits. Zimmer also criticized Wetmore's association with Project Veritas, a group known for its far-right activism, arguing that such ties should disqualify him from the role. He urged the board to keep the position vacant to avoid further complications.

Another speaker, identified as Here in Obis from Spring Lake, echoed these sentiments, questioning Wetmore's qualifications and suggesting that his political connections with the Ottawa Impact faction could lead to biased hiring practices within the county administration. This speaker warned that appointing Wetmore would signal a shift towards political favoritism in county governance.

The meeting underscored a growing tension within the board regarding the direction of county leadership and the implications of political affiliations on administrative appointments. As the board considers its next steps, the public's concerns reflect a broader unease about governance and accountability in the wake of recent administrative changes.