Emotions ran high during a recent government meeting in Cornelius, where residents voiced strong opposition to a proposed hotel development near the Stratford Forest community. The meeting featured passionate testimonies from local residents, who expressed concerns about safety, property values, and the overall impact on their family-oriented neighborhood.
Wasim Al Abed, a community member, emphasized that while residents do not oppose development, they specifically oppose the hotel project. He highlighted three main concerns: the potential influx of strangers, noise and light pollution disrupting the peaceful environment, and the negative impact on property values. Al Abed urged the board to consider the human impacts of the development rather than just technical requirements.
Other residents echoed these sentiments. Hannah Sellers suggested that the land could be better utilized for eco-friendly projects, such as a park. Lewis Borges raised concerns about the hotel’s proximity to homes, arguing that it would not provide adequate visual barriers and could lead to increased crime rates. He noted that the transient nature of hotel guests poses a risk to neighborhood safety.
Diana Borges, a mother of four, shared her fears about the safety of her children, stating that the hotel would disrupt the sense of security that attracted her family to the neighborhood. She expressed that the presence of a hotel would deter potential homebuyers, thereby affecting property values.
Tommy Mann, a financial planner, highlighted the economic implications of the hotel, explaining how a decline in property values could lead to increased property taxes and reduced funding for local services. He urged the council to consider the long-term financial health of the community.
Morgan Cooley raised alarming statistics regarding crime associated with hotels, citing incidents of theft, vandalism, and even human trafficking. She stressed that the hotel’s location near major highways could exacerbate these issues, putting children at risk.
Kara Matusko, a long-time resident, reiterated concerns about safety and crime, referencing police reports that indicated a significant number of incidents at nearby hotels. She argued that a business building would be a more suitable development, providing a controlled environment that aligns with community values.
The meeting concluded with a clear message from residents: they are united in their opposition to the hotel development, advocating for a solution that prioritizes the safety and well-being of their community. The board is expected to deliberate on the matter in the coming weeks, with community members hopeful that their voices will be heard.