In a recent government meeting, the request of Therese Smith to subdivide her property was a focal point of discussion. Smith, who has lived on her three-acre lot for over 30 years, is seeking to create additional lots to accommodate her family circumstances, including the recent custody of her two grandchildren.

During the meeting, it was clarified that of the three options presented for subdivision, only the 400-layer option would allow Smith to create two lots from her property. While she expressed a desire to subdivide for three lots, the presence of tidal marshes to the southeast of her property complicates the situation, rendering it undividable under current regulations.

Smith was informed that her alternative would be to request a variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), a process that could incur additional costs and complexities. The discussion highlighted the challenges faced by property owners in navigating zoning laws, particularly when personal circumstances necessitate changes to property use.

Smith articulated her need for the subdivision, emphasizing the unforeseen family changes that have prompted her request. The meeting underscored the intersection of personal needs and regulatory frameworks, raising questions about the accessibility of zoning processes for individuals in similar situations.