During a recent city council meeting in Titusville, members engaged in discussions surrounding several key agenda items, including the approval of various contracts and the allocation of funds for city projects.

The council reviewed a consent agenda that included the purchase of two fire engines, the award of a proposal for a historic preservation officer, and collective bargaining agreements with the Fraternal Order of Police. Notably, the council also addressed the purchase of body cameras and other equipment for the police department, as well as the reallocation of American Rescue Plan Act funds.

A significant point of contention arose regarding the consulting services for inclusionary housing and linkage fees. Member Stoeckle expressed concerns about the $90,000 consulting fee, arguing that the city should not proceed with this expenditure given recent decisions to withhold tax incentives for affordable housing projects. Member Nelson echoed this sentiment, suggesting that the council should focus on existing projects rather than incurring new consulting costs. Ultimately, the council voted to deny the consulting contract, reflecting a consensus on the need to prioritize current initiatives.

Public input was also a focal point of the meeting, with residents voicing concerns about the council's spending priorities. Stan Johnston, a local engineer, criticized the council for not adequately addressing sewage spill testing and urged members to prioritize public health and safety over smaller expenditures. Additionally, resident Vicki Conklin raised questions about the bidding process for city contracts, advocating for a local vendor policy to support businesses within Titusville.

The council unanimously approved the remaining consent agenda items, signaling a commitment to advancing various city projects while also addressing community concerns about fiscal responsibility and local business support.