During a recent city council meeting, officials discussed the critical 90-day timeline for processing applications, emphasizing the potential consequences of failing to meet this deadline. Council members expressed concerns about the implications for funding eligibility and the risk of legal challenges if the timeline is not adhered to.

One council member raised questions about what would happen if the council did not convene within the 90 days, suggesting that a lack of action could jeopardize future funding opportunities. It was noted that while the guidelines do not explicitly allow for extensions, there might be room to request a 30-day extension under certain circumstances. However, this would not be a standard practice and would need to be justified beyond mere scheduling conflicts.

The discussion highlighted the need for careful planning and coordination among council members to accommodate various calendars and holidays, particularly when working with developers to establish a timeline that aligns with the 90-day requirement. The council acknowledged the importance of mapping out this timeline during the pre-application process to anticipate potential challenges.

Additionally, concerns were raised about the feasibility of conducting necessary hearings, such as those required for vacating public rights-of-way, within the stipulated timeframe. The council recognized that their calendar is already booked months in advance, complicating the ability to meet the 90-day requirement.

Overall, the meeting underscored the urgency for the council to streamline processes and ensure compliance with the timeline to avoid jeopardizing funding and facing legal repercussions.