During a recent Monroe County government meeting, community members voiced significant concerns regarding a proposed Comprehensive Development Ordinance (CDO) that could impact local agriculture, housing, and land use.

One of the most passionate speakers, a local farmer, highlighted the potential negative effects of the CDO on agricultural practices, particularly for young 4-H participants who rely on livestock for both personal and business purposes. She argued that the proposed regulations, including a 20-foot setback for chicken coops, could severely hinder their ability to maintain livestock and participate in county fairs, ultimately harming the community's agricultural heritage.

Ayesha Polk, a recent Habitat for Humanity homeowner, shared her personal journey of overcoming housing instability and emphasized the importance of affordable housing for families in Monroe County. She urged officials to prioritize housing initiatives that foster stability and well-being for children and families, noting the positive changes she has witnessed in her own children since moving into a stable home.

Guy Lofman, a resident near the Robertson Farm, expressed his opposition to proposed changes that would reduce lot sizes from one acre to 0.22 acres, arguing that such developments would disrupt the rural character of the area. He emphasized the need for community input in planning decisions and highlighted the importance of preserving local land for current and future generations.

Other speakers echoed concerns about the CDO's potential to exacerbate the housing crisis in Monroe County. Jody Madera pointed out that the draft does not align with the county's comprehensive plan for sustainable growth and could lead to increased suburban sprawl. She called for a revision of the draft to better balance development with environmental protections.

Donnie Atkins criticized the CDO for lacking provisions that support attainable housing, urging county leaders to prioritize housing solutions in their planning efforts. He emphasized the urgency of addressing the housing shortage to retain families and attract new residents.

As the meeting progressed, several residents called for an extension of the review period for the CDO to allow for broader community engagement and understanding of its implications. They expressed a desire for a collaborative approach to ensure that the ordinance meets the needs of all residents while preserving the county's rural character.

The discussions highlighted a community deeply invested in its agricultural roots and housing stability, with residents advocating for thoughtful planning that considers both current needs and future growth. The county officials are now faced with the challenge of balancing these diverse interests as they move forward with the CDO.