In a recent government meeting, the board addressed the second reading of an ordinance aimed at increasing water rates for the Spring Valley Lakes community. This proposal, which follows the Proposition 218 process, has sparked significant public concern and opposition.

Director Borre introduced the ordinance, emphasizing its necessity for adjusting water rates. However, community members expressed frustration over the lack of transparency and adequate communication regarding the rate hike process. Lisa Sherrill, a resident, highlighted that many in the community were unaware of the voting process during a July meeting, which was initially described as informational. She noted that the advisory board's decision was made with limited public input, as only a small group attended the meeting where the vote took place.

Sherrill also pointed out discrepancies in the reported number of customers served by the county service area, which she argued undermined the legitimacy of the rate increase proposal. According to her, over 50% of the community has submitted protest letters against the hike, exceeding the threshold required to halt the proposal under Proposition 218.

Another resident, Helen Mitcham, echoed concerns about the financial burden the rate increase would impose on those with fixed incomes, particularly in a community still recovering from recent wildfires. She urged the board to reconsider the proposal, suggesting that the financial implications had not been fully explored, including potential adjustments to standby fees and other revenue sources.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between local government decisions and community needs, as residents called for more inclusive discussions and a thorough examination of the financial data supporting the proposed rate increase. The board is expected to deliberate further on the ordinance, taking into account the significant public opposition and the concerns raised during the meeting.