In a recent city council meeting, a contentious debate unfolded regarding the approval of a massage establishment license for a local business. The Green Bay Police Department (GBPD) recommended denying the application due to a series of compliance issues observed during inspections. Council members discussed the establishment's history, which included findings of unlicensed personnel performing massages and concerns about potential illegal activities linked to the business.

The council's deliberations revealed a split in opinion. Some members, like Alder Eck, supported the police's recommendation to deny the license, citing ongoing risks associated with the establishment's operations. Alder Eck raised concerns about the presence of unlicensed workers and the establishment's online reputation, which included troubling advertisements suggesting illicit services.

Conversely, other council members, including Alder Hutchison and Alder Proffitt, argued for approval, emphasizing that subsequent inspections showed compliance and that the owner was a licensed massage therapist. They contended that denying the license despite meeting the criteria would set a negative precedent for future applications.

The discussion also touched on the procedural aspects of the licensing process, with some council members advocating for a hold on the decision to allow for further investigation into the allegations surrounding the business. Alder Johnson proposed a motion to hold the application until the police could provide a report on the concerns raised, which was seconded and supported by several members.

Ultimately, the council decided to postpone the decision, allowing time for a thorough review of the establishment's compliance history and any potential criminal investigations related to the allegations. The matter will be revisited in the next council meeting, highlighting the ongoing scrutiny of business practices within the community and the council's commitment to ensuring public safety.