During a recent government meeting, a resident of Clifton Township raised concerns regarding a proposed porta-potty business in River Falls, emphasizing its location within an urban reserve. The speaker, who owns multiple properties in the area, expressed that while he appreciated the presentation by Mr. Klyce, he believed the business was a poor fit for the designated urban reserve, which was established with specific guidelines to protect the area’s integrity.

The resident argued that the examples provided by Mr. Klyce, which suggested that similar businesses thrive in comparable locations, were misleading. He pointed out that this particular business is unique in its placement within an urban reserve and that the philosophy behind such zoning was not intended to accommodate this type of operation. He expressed skepticism about the financing of the project, questioning how it advanced without the necessary permits and suggesting that the development was already operational despite lacking proper authorization.

Furthermore, he criticized the two-minute speaking limit imposed during public comments, deeming it inadequate for discussing such significant issues. The resident concluded by highlighting his background in conservation and his involvement with local environmental initiatives, reinforcing his commitment to preserving the area’s natural resources. The discussion reflects ongoing tensions between development and conservation in River Falls, as community members seek to balance economic growth with environmental stewardship.