In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding environmental compliance and water quality issues linked to cannabis cultivation in a sensitive area. Kate Hawken, a water resource control engineer for the No Coast Regional Water Control Board, reported that after an extensive review, the board found no substantial evidence of water quality degradation on the property in question. However, local stakeholders argue that the assessment was flawed, lacking a site visit and thorough documentation review.

Residents expressed alarm over potential violations affecting neighboring roads, land, and water resources, particularly seasonal streams and a shared aquifer. They highlighted that the absence of a proper site evaluation has left them vulnerable to legal repercussions for allegedly filing false reports. The community is now seeking assistance from the central office to facilitate a comprehensive review of the situation, including a site visit to assess water hauling practices, road construction, waste disposal, and erosion control measures.

Concerns were also raised about the management of water resources, with claims that the cultivation operations are injecting excessive water into the environment, leading to increased insect populations and other ecological disturbances. The community pointed out that the grower has failed to maintain required documentation for water hauling due to restrictions on commercial permits in federal lands.

Additionally, residents criticized the construction of roads that they believe do not comply with California regulations, citing improper design and execution without qualified oversight. They reported instances of debris trespassing onto neighboring properties and raised alarms about waste disposal practices, which they claim have been cited by Cal Fire for improper logging and disposal methods.

The meeting concluded with a call for soil testing and a review of erosion control measures, as local authorities have previously mandated such actions that remain unfulfilled. The community is advocating for a reconsideration of the water board's approval of the cultivation operation, citing a history of noncompliance and the potential for significant environmental impact.