During a recent city council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the transparency of the Harley Clark Request for Proposals (RFP) process. Several residents expressed frustration over what they perceive as a lack of openness in decision-making, suggesting that the council may be acting merely as a rubber stamp for predetermined outcomes.

One speaker emphasized the need for the three proposals to be made public, advocating for a thorough review by relevant committees, including Parks and Recreation, Preservation, and Equity and Empowerment. This speaker argued that the council should take its time to ensure community input is valued, rather than rushing through the process.

Jane McCarthy, a long-time resident and member of the Evanston Community Lakehouse and Gardens Board Committee, echoed these sentiments, stating that the lack of transparency has led to embarrassment and frustration among residents. She highlighted the importance of clear communication regarding the future of the Harley Clark building, warning that such processes could deter community involvement in city projects.

Linda Damashek, who has been involved with the Harley Clark issue since 2013, called for full transparency and public presentations from all proposers. She reminded the council of the overwhelming support from residents, noting that 85% of voters in each ward favored keeping the building for public use.

In contrast to the discussions surrounding Harley Clark, Kimberly Holmes Ross, the executive director of Evanston Cradle to Career, urged the council to approve the Pathways to Wellness Health Initiative, which aims to assist vulnerable citizens in the community. This initiative received support from multiple speakers, highlighting a collective desire for improved access to health care in Evanston.

The meeting concluded with a commitment to further public engagement and transparency in the decision-making processes affecting the community.