During a recent school board meeting, significant discussions arose regarding the termination of Coach Corey Farner, which has sparked controversy within the Woodhaven-Brownstown School District. A former coach, who spoke in support of Farner, expressed deep disappointment in the district's decision, asserting that it was unjustified and not reflective of Farner's character or commitment to the students.

The speaker emphasized that Farner had been a dedicated coach with exemplary character and loyalty to the district, urging the board to reconsider their decision. \"Firing Corey was wrong,\" the speaker stated, calling for the district to own its mistakes and rectify the situation.

Following public comments, the board addressed a grievance presented by Sue Neely, President of the Woodhaven-Brownstown Education Association (WBEA). Neely argued that Farner's termination violated contractual agreements, specifically citing a lack of just cause as outlined in the contract. She pointed out that the termination letter did not mention misconduct, contradicting claims made during the grievance process.

Neely detailed the procedural failures in Farner's termination, highlighting that the district did not follow the proper evaluation and improvement processes mandated by their own policies. She noted that Farner had received a satisfactory evaluation prior to his dismissal, which further complicated the justification for his termination.

The grievance also raised concerns about potential violations of the Open Meetings Act, suggesting that the board may not have adhered to legal protocols during their discussions leading to Farner's termination. Neely's presentation included references to past incidents involving other coaches, drawing parallels to highlight inconsistencies in how disciplinary actions have been handled within the district.

As the meeting progressed, the atmosphere reflected a community divided over the decision, with many parents and supporters rallying behind Farner. The board's next steps remain uncertain as they navigate the implications of the grievance and the community's response to the ongoing situation.