In a recent city council meeting, officials discussed the implications of a state statute that has effectively rendered a local ordinance regarding eligibility for office non-enforceable. The ordinance, which limited candidates' eligibility to run for local office, was challenged by a new state law that emerged from a referendum supported by over 10,000 voters in the community.

City attorney Krafveffer emphasized the importance of respecting the will of the voters, suggesting that the council should refrain from taking any action that could lead to unnecessary litigation. He argued that if the state law contradicts the local ordinance, it is prudent to allow the courts to resolve any potential disputes rather than preemptively removing the ordinance from the books.

Attorney Casper added that maintaining the outdated ordinance could confuse future candidates, as it no longer reflects the current legal landscape. He pointed out that Calumet City is unique in having implemented such a rule, which required candidates to resign from state office to run for local positions—a practice not seen in any other municipality in the United States.

The council members acknowledged the need for clarity in the local code to avoid misleading constituents. They discussed the potential consequences of inaction, which could leave an unenforceable law on the books, further complicating the electoral process for future candidates.

As the meeting concluded, the council faced a decision on whether to amend the local ordinance to align with the state law, ensuring that the rules governing local elections are clear and accurate for all residents.