In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the proposed EQIP Act, which aims to establish a disaster deductible for states seeking federal assistance for public infrastructure repairs following major disasters. The legislation, championed by Subcommittee Chairman Perry, seeks to require states to pay a deductible based on either three times their population or the amount of federal assistance provided, whichever is higher. This initiative is intended to ensure that taxpayers are not solely responsible for disaster relief costs and to promote fiscal responsibility among states.

However, the bill faced opposition from several members, including Mr. Larson, who argued that the existing requirement for states to cover 25% of disaster costs already demonstrates their commitment. Larson emphasized that the increasing costs of disaster response are primarily due to the rising frequency of disasters linked to climate change, rather than a lack of state investment. He urged a focus on meaningful climate resilience and mitigation efforts instead of imposing additional financial burdens on states and local governments.

The National Emergency Managers Association and other stakeholders have expressed their opposition to the bill, citing concerns over its potential impact on local emergency management capabilities. Despite the pushback, Perry defended the EQIP Act as a necessary measure to ensure accountability and efficiency in disaster assistance, highlighting that similar concepts have been previously supported in past administrations.

The meeting concluded with discussions on an amendment that would allow states to count certain pre-disaster activities towards their deductible, potentially incentivizing proactive disaster preparedness. As the bill moves forward, its implications for state disaster funding and climate resilience efforts remain a critical point of contention among lawmakers.