During a recent government meeting, Administrator Guzman faced intense scrutiny from committee members regarding the decision-making processes within the Office of Credit Risk Management. The discussion highlighted concerns over the agency's credibility, with one member accusing Guzman of either perjuring herself or being misled, describing the situation as a \"black eye\" on the agency.

The committee's focus on oversight activities raised questions about the last time funding for these initiatives was increased, indicating a broader concern about the agency's ability to effectively manage its responsibilities. This dialogue reflects ongoing tensions between government oversight and the operational integrity of agencies tasked with supporting small businesses. The implications of these discussions could lead to further investigations and potential reforms aimed at enhancing accountability within the agency.