In a recent government meeting, Pennsylvania lawmakers convened to discuss proposed reforms to the state's divorce code, which has remained largely unchanged since significant revisions in 1990. Representative Howard, the prime sponsor of House Bill 2303, emphasized the urgent need for reform, citing the challenges faced by individuals navigating the current divorce process, which he described as costly, delayed, and often detrimental, particularly for those experiencing domestic violence.
The meeting featured testimony from legal experts, including Mark Ashtin, a retired partner at Fox Rothschild, and Susan Perlstein, a senior attorney with the Philadelphia Legal Assistance Family Law Unit. Both witnesses highlighted the outdated nature of the existing divorce laws, which have not kept pace with modern societal needs. Ashtin noted that many provisions of the divorce code are antiquated, some dating back to the 18th century, and called for a comprehensive reevaluation of the system.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The discussions underscored the importance of gathering input from professionals who work closely with the divorce process to ensure that any reforms address the real-life implications for Pennsylvanians. Representative Howard expressed hope for a constructive dialogue on the proposed changes, aiming to create a more practical and supportive framework for those undergoing divorce in the state. The meeting marks a critical step towards potentially overhauling a system that many believe is in dire need of modernization.