Residents of a Johnson County neighborhood expressed strong opposition during a recent government meeting regarding a proposed development plan that includes the construction of 202 multifamily housing units. The meeting featured multiple speakers who voiced concerns about the potential impact on property values, neighborhood character, and traffic congestion.

Sean Edwards, a resident for 17 years, highlighted his apprehensions about the project, citing personal experiences with similar developments in other cities that led to increased crime and decreased property values. He emphasized that he based his home purchase on the existing zoning and expressed frustration over the lack of transparency regarding the nature of the proposed housing, which he described as \"low income housing.\"

Bill Rao, another local resident, criticized the development's design, arguing that it does not align with the character of the surrounding area. He pointed to successful transitions from commercial to residential developments in the vicinity as a model for what the project should emulate.

Joanna Cox, a newcomer to the area, raised concerns about the potential for increased traffic and the aesthetic impact of the development on her property. She questioned the necessity of adding more apartments in a region known for its high property values and safe environment, suggesting that the influx of multifamily units could lead to crime and devaluation of existing homes.

Commissioner Creighton echoed the residents' concerns, stating that the proposed plan does not meet the standards set by the board in previous approvals for similar projects. He noted that the plan lacks adequate setbacks and does not reflect the neighborhood's character.

The meeting concluded with a motion to close the public hearing, but the discussions highlighted a significant divide between the city's development goals and the residents' desire to maintain the integrity of their community. The commissioners are expected to deliberate further on the proposal, weighing the potential benefits of the development against the residents' concerns.