In a recent government meeting, intense discussions centered around the U.S. decision to renew Chevron's operating license in Venezuela, just 33 days after President Nicolás Maduro's controversial actions. Chairwoman Maria Salazar pressed U.S. officials on the rationale behind this renewal, questioning whether it was influenced by the White House's desire for cheaper oil amidst Venezuela's ongoing humanitarian crisis.

Salazar highlighted the contradiction in U.S. policy, noting that while the U.S. government has condemned Maduro's regime for electoral fraud and repression, the renewal of Chevron's license appears to support the very regime responsible for the suffering of millions of Venezuelans. She emphasized that the decision could exacerbate the migrant crisis, as many Venezuelans are reportedly prepared to flee the country if Maduro remains in power.

In response, U.S. officials maintained that the renewal was part of a broader strategy to promote a democratic transition in Venezuela. They stated that sanctions are reviewed regularly and that the administration aims to apply targeted actions that align with diplomatic objectives. However, Salazar challenged this narrative, arguing that allowing companies like Chevron to operate effectively bolsters Maduro's regime rather than undermining it.

The meeting also touched on the broader implications of U.S. sanctions policy, with Salazar questioning the administration's commitment to holding Maduro accountable. She pointed out that despite the U.S. imposing individual sanctions on key officials involved in electoral manipulation, the continued support for oil companies contradicts efforts to pressure the regime.

As the discussion unfolded, it became clear that the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in Venezuela remain contentious, with significant implications for both the Venezuelan people and international relations. The meeting underscored the ongoing debate over the effectiveness of sanctions and the U.S. approach to dealing with authoritarian regimes.