In a recent court session, several motions were discussed concerning the ongoing custody and mental health evaluations of Mr. Kantai. The court addressed a motion to waive mediation, a request for Mr. Kantai to undergo random drug screenings, and a motion for him to complete mental health treatment as recommended by a psychiatrist.

Mr. Kantai's attorney argued against the effectiveness of mediation, citing ongoing adversarial behavior between the parties involved. However, the court emphasized the importance of mediation as a potential avenue for resolution, noting that it often requires both parties to approach it with an open mind.

The court also reviewed the results of a Rule 35 psychiatric evaluation conducted by Dr. Montgomery, which diagnosed Mr. Kantai with unspecified mood and personality disorders, as well as substance use disorders. Mr. Kantai vehemently disagreed with the findings, claiming inaccuracies and omissions in the report. He expressed a desire to pursue a second evaluation at his own expense, which the court permitted, provided he notifies the opposing party.

Additionally, the court discussed the implications of Mr. Kantai's refusal to comply with the recommended mental health treatment. The judge indicated that any non-compliance could be considered in future hearings, particularly if no alternative evaluation is conducted.

The session concluded with the court reserving the decision on the motion to waive mediation, highlighting that a final hearing date would not be set until next year, pending further developments in the case.