During a recent government meeting, the discussion centered on two key items: the endorsement of a contract with the City of Tampa and a debate over voting procedures within the commission.

Commissioners expressed their support for moving forward with a contract, emphasizing trust in the chief's evaluation and decision-making. There was a consensus to proceed without further debate, indicating a unified front on this matter.

The more contentious topic arose from Commissioner Hayes, who initiated a discussion on the implications of changing from super majority voting to simple majority voting. This proposal, which would shift the required votes from four to three for certain decisions, sparked a range of opinions among the commissioners. While Hayes advocated for a low-level discussion to explore the pros and cons, other commissioners expressed strong opposition to the idea. They argued that altering the voting structure could lead to instability and potentially deter business investment in the city. One commissioner highlighted the importance of maintaining the status quo, citing the city's current success as a reason to avoid changes.

The meeting concluded with a commitment to revisit the voting discussion in a future workshop, reflecting the ongoing deliberation among city leaders about governance practices.