In a recent Lynchburg City School board meeting, significant discussions emerged regarding class sizes and the controversial decision to eliminate the Equity Task Force.

During the meeting, a school board member suggested that a class size of 28 could be manageable with \"good actors,\" while a smaller class of 21 with \"bad actors\" would not be. This comment sparked concern among attendees, who argued that labeling students as \"good\" or \"bad\" is problematic. One speaker emphasized that managing a class of 28 students with a single teacher is impractical and detrimental to the quality of education, urging the board to consider community feedback and maintain a forward-thinking approach.

The elimination of the Equity Task Force was another focal point of the meeting. Phil Stump, representing Virginia Organizing and a former member of the task force, expressed his dismay at the decision. He highlighted the task force's productive and transparent operations, which aimed to address inequities within the school system. Stump criticized the board's rationale for disbanding the task force, particularly a statement from Vice Chair Day suggesting that the board could implement equity measures independently.

Stump passionately articulated the distinction between equity and equality, emphasizing that equity acknowledges the unequal starting points of students and the need to level the playing field. He recounted personal experiences illustrating systemic inequities faced by students of color and urged the board to reestablish the Equity Task Force to ensure that the voices of marginalized groups are heard in decision-making processes.

The discussions reflect ongoing concerns about educational equity and the challenges of managing classroom environments effectively, underscoring the need for continued dialogue and community involvement in shaping educational policies.