Board faces backlash over administrative leave policy changes

In a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the implications of proposed changes to the administrative leave policy for non-union employees. Board members discussed the potential lack of clarity surrounding employees' rights to appeal findings from investigations while on administrative leave, particularly for those not represented by unions.

One board member emphasized the importance of ensuring that all staff, especially administrative personnel, retain the right to appeal decisions made against them. The discussion highlighted that the original policy, revised in 2017, was designed to protect administrative staff and provide them with recourse in the event of allegations. The proposed revisions, however, have led to fears that these protections may be diminished, leaving non-union employees without adequate means to contest decisions.

The board clarified that while employees placed on administrative leave would continue to receive pay during investigations, the language in the revised policy does not explicitly guarantee the same appeal rights that were previously outlined. This has raised concerns about fairness and transparency in the disciplinary process, particularly as the board would be asked to consider only one side of the allegations.

Additionally, it was noted that tenured teachers among the administrative staff still have certain protections under existing tenure laws, which may provide some level of security. However, the board members expressed a strong commitment to ensuring that all staff members, regardless of union status, are afforded the necessary protections and rights during investigations.

The meeting underscored the board's responsibility to safeguard the interests of its employees while navigating the complexities of policy revisions. As discussions continue, the board is expected to review the proposed changes further to address these critical concerns.