In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the implications of a proposed zoning change that would create a new rural zone, referred to as RAR 20. The primary focus was on the potential impact this zoning could have on landowners, particularly those in rural areas who may not be aware of the changes.

The discussion highlighted concerns about the lack of public engagement and transparency surrounding the zoning proposal. Several officials expressed that the rushed nature of the process could leave affected landowners with limited recourse to voice their opinions or influence the details of the new zoning district. One member emphasized the importance of involving local residents, particularly those living near the Green River and in the Book Cliffs area, in the decision-making process.

The meeting also touched on the classification of land uses within the new zone. There was a debate about whether to allow single-family dwellings on large parcels designated for agriculture or mining, with some members arguing that living on-site is essential for operational efficiency. However, there was resistance to allowing duplexes or group homes in the new zoning classification.

Concerns were raised about the absence of a comprehensive future land use map, which many officials felt was necessary to understand the broader implications of the zoning change. Some members suggested that the proposal should be postponed until more information is available and local residents can be adequately informed.

Ultimately, the committee voted to recommend an unfavorable outcome for the RAR 20 proposal, reflecting the apprehension surrounding its potential impact on the community and the need for further discussion and clarity before moving forward.