During a recent city council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding a proposed ballot measure that seeks to terminate TABOR (Taxpayer's Bill of Rights) restrictions in Lakewood. The council voted 9 to 1 in favor of placing this measure on the November ballot, a decision that has sparked considerable debate among residents and council members alike.

One resident expressed strong opposition to the measure, arguing that it is unethical for the city to use taxpayer dollars to influence voting behavior. The resident highlighted that while the ballot claims it will not increase taxes, the elimination of TABOR refunds could effectively lead to higher costs for taxpayers. The resident emphasized that the funds earmarked for essential services like police, parks, and public works are misleading, as the existing TABOR fund already allocates a significant portion of the city’s budget to these areas.

Council member Rich Alver, who voted against the measure, echoed these sentiments, labeling the council's actions as \"shenanigans.\" He pointed out that while the ballot language may be technically accurate, it obscures the reality that voters may not fully grasp the long-term implications of relinquishing their TABOR rights. Alver noted that the TABOR fund had a balance of $30 million at the end of 2022, and the majority of the city’s budget is already consumed by these departments.

Another council member drew parallels between the ballot measure's language and political rhetoric, suggesting that while statements may be technically true, they can be misleading. The council member criticized the ballot's assertion that revenue will be allocated to specific services, arguing that the funds could ultimately be redirected to other council priorities, including government-subsidized housing initiatives.

As the council prepares for the upcoming vote, residents are urged to consider the implications of the measure carefully, particularly regarding the potential loss of TABOR refunds and the transparency of how tax dollars will be utilized. The discussions reflect a broader concern about fiscal responsibility and the need for clear communication from city officials to ensure that voters are fully informed before making a decision at the polls.