During a recent Seattle Public Schools (SPS) board meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to proposed school closures and changes to advanced learning programs, emphasizing the potential negative impacts on students and families.

A young student expressed concern that the district's financial strategies could undermine cultural connections for children, urging leaders to prioritize inclusivity and equity in education. This sentiment was echoed by Janice White, a parent and president of the nonprofit All Youth Belong, who criticized proposed amendments to policy 2190. She argued that these changes could hinder accountability for the identification of students of color and those with special needs, particularly in the context of the new neighborhood model for service delivery.

Chris Jackins, another speaker, raised multiple points against the school closure plan, highlighting a lack of transparency and environmental considerations in the district's facility planning. He criticized the term \"well-resourced schools,\" suggesting it creates unnecessary competition among schools and downplays the real financial implications of closures.

Ben Gittenstein, a former school board candidate, linked the renaming of Highly Capable Cohort (HCC) services to broader concerns about the district's commitment to advanced learning. He warned that the proposed changes could lead to inadequate support for gifted students, ultimately harming the educational landscape.

Stephanie Gove Yin, a parent of a second grader, called for concrete plans and measurable outcomes regarding the transition of advanced learning services back to neighborhood schools. She expressed frustration over the lack of detailed communication from the district, urging the board to reject the proposed amendments until a comprehensive strategy is presented.

Candace Casparian, a parent of a student at an option school, highlighted the unique educational experiences provided by schools like Thornton Creek, which focus on social-emotional learning. She argued that such programs are essential for children who thrive in non-traditional learning environments and cautioned against the potential loss of these options.

The meeting underscored a growing concern among parents and community members regarding the future of educational services in Seattle, as they called for greater accountability and a more thoughtful approach to school closures and program restructuring.