During a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed deck addition to a residential property that has raised concerns regarding zoning setbacks. The property owner, represented by Mr. Spitzley, sought to address an encroachment issue after constructing a deck that extends into the mandated 100-foot setback from the lake.

The board reviewed the situation, noting that the deck was initially planned to be built at the edge of the setback but was ultimately constructed closer to the lake, leading to the current violation. The board also discussed the removal of a stairway that had been added to the structure, which was deemed unnecessary and subsequently dismantled.

Clarifications were made regarding the specific deck in question, confirming that it is located on the second floor of the house and does not interfere with the landscaped patio area. The board members engaged in a thorough examination of the property’s layout, including the proximity of the deck to the lake, which was determined to be compliant with existing regulations to a significant degree—approximately 88 feet from the water, representing a 12% deviation from the setback requirement.

Community feedback was solicited, with one neighbor, Mary Jefferson, expressing strong support for the deck addition, stating it does not obstruct sightlines to the lake and enhances the property’s appeal. The board concluded the public hearing and moved towards a decision on the variance request, with members acknowledging the compliance levels and the community's positive reception of the changes made to the property.