In a recent government meeting, significant discussions centered around proposed changes to Title IX policies, particularly regarding harassment of students and employees. The meeting began with a motion to address policy AC, which focuses on nondiscrimination, equal opportunity, and affirmative action. Members acknowledged the complexity of tracking various policy updates, with existing policies like ACAB on harassment of employees noted as needing revisions that were not yet completed.

The most contentious topic arose during the first reading of policy ACAA, which addresses harassment of students. Board member Darcy expressed strong opposition to adopting changes aligned with the Department of Education's new Title IX rule. She argued that the proposed changes undermine protections for female students and deviate from the original intent of Title IX, which she believes should adhere to the 2020 rule that recognizes the SCOTUS Davis standard. This standard, established in 1999, provides an objective measure for determining Title IX violations related to sexual harassment.

Darcy's concerns highlighted the ongoing litigation involving 26 states challenging the legality of the new Title IX rule, which she claims removes essential due process rights and compromises the safety and privacy of female students. She emphasized the importance of maintaining policies that reflect the original principles of Title IX, advocating for protections based on \"truth, reality, and fairness.\"

The meeting concluded with a call for further discussion, as members continued to grapple with the implications of these policy changes on students and the educational environment.