In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a variance application for a boat ramp that has been in place since 1987. The applicant, represented by Don Craig, argued that the ramp's existence predates current parking requirements for boat trailers and that the property would no longer function as a marina as of January 2021. Craig emphasized that a major conditional use approval, which has already been upheld through an appeal, prohibits parking trailers and boats on the property, creating a burden if the variance is not granted.
Craig pointed out that the county staff had miscalculated the percentage of the variance requested, asserting that parking variances are typically evaluated based on the number of spaces rather than their area. He stated that all criteria for granting the variance had been met and that denying it would impose unnecessary restrictions on the property.
During the meeting, questions arose regarding the county's parking space standards, with discussions confirming that the minimum width for parking spaces is 8.5 feet. Additionally, inquiries were made about the operational plans for the site, particularly concerning the management of barges, which are to be kept either in the water or at designated locations.
Public comments included concerns from local resident Stephanie Brown, who criticized the applicant for creating a self-imposed parking hardship by exceeding the county's density standards. She argued that the request for a variance was based on financial hardships, which do not qualify as exceptional under the county's land development code.
The meeting highlighted the ongoing tension between development interests and community standards, as stakeholders continue to navigate the implications of the proposed variance on local regulations and property use.