In a recent government meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed two significant applications, one concerning a Chesapeake Bay exception for a residential property and another for a use permit for a shipping container chassis storage yard.

The first application involved a request to construct a single-family dwelling at 208 Allen Road, which lies within the 50-foot seaward buffer of a Resource Protection Area (RPA). The RPA includes tidal wetlands and is governed by strict regulations under the Portsmouth City Code and Virginia State Code. The applicant seeks a Chesapeake Bay exception to allow for this construction, which is typically not permitted in such sensitive areas. The Planning Department staff recommended approval, noting that the applicant had minimized land disturbance by obtaining a variance to reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 16.5 feet. This adjustment allows for a smaller encroachment into the buffer, with approximately 780 square feet of the proposed dwelling extending into the seaward buffer. The applicant also proposed mitigation measures, including best management practices to manage stormwater runoff.

During the discussion, commissioners raised concerns about the environmental status of the RPA and the potential cumulative impact of similar requests in the area. Staff reassured them that the proposed mitigation efforts would adequately protect water quality and that the project aligns with the character of the surrounding neighborhood.

The second application was for a use permit to operate a shipping container chassis storage yard at 3015 Airline Boulevard. The site, zoned for light industrial use, would accommodate up to 50 truck parking spaces and employ five office staff and 20 truck drivers. The operation is expected to have minimal traffic impact, with a traffic impact analysis indicating no need for additional transportation improvements. However, staff noted that while the proposed use fits the surrounding area, it does not represent the highest and best use of the property, which could better serve manufacturing or distribution needs.

Both applications are set to be further discussed in upcoming public meetings, with no public comments received to date. The Planning Commission continues to evaluate the balance between development and environmental protection in these sensitive areas.