During a recent government meeting, community members expressed significant concerns regarding the proposed South Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) in Zionsville. One resident, who had thoroughly reviewed the 63-page document, highlighted issues related to density, traffic, and tree preservation. She noted that the latest PUD lacked clarity on the location of 62-foot tall apartment buildings and questioned the removal of a previously stated 40% tree preservation requirement.

The resident raised several questions about the PUD's vague language, particularly regarding the term \"intent\" related to building heights. She expressed worry that this could allow for potential variances that might lead to higher density housing than the community desires. She emphasized the importance of understanding how the development could impact the town's future, especially if developers could easily shift plans to favor more profitable apartment buildings over other uses like restaurants or art galleries.

Another speaker, Kelly Seyer, shared her views on the development, stating that while she supports some level of development, it should not proceed without a comprehensive plan in place. She argued that the current push for the PUD contradicts previous statements from town officials about the need for a guiding plan to manage growth effectively. Seyer also expressed concerns about the lack of affordable housing options in Zionsville and the potential for the new apartments to be out of reach for many residents.

Both speakers echoed a common sentiment among community members: the need for careful consideration and planning before moving forward with such a significant development. They urged the town council and planning commission to prioritize the completion of the comprehensive plan to ensure that future developments align with the community's needs and values. The meeting highlighted a clear divide between the desire for growth and the community's concerns about maintaining Zionsville's character and livability.