In a recent school board meeting, heated discussions emerged regarding the potential termination of Superintendent Dr. Fagan, primarily centered on claims of her failure to maintain a relationship with the board. Board member Miss Lamon Dixon expressed strong opposition to the motion, arguing that the reasons cited for termination lacked validity and did not align with the initial rationale for placing Dr. Fagan on leave.

Dixon emphasized that the board had not provided Dr. Fagan with an improvement plan or any written documentation regarding her performance, which she deemed essential for due process. She pointed out that the board had not convened a meeting of the board and superintendent evaluation committee for an entire year, failing to address any concerns or set goals for Dr. Fagan's improvement.

Highlighting the financial implications of the board's actions, Dixon noted that the potential costs associated with Dr. Fagan's termination could exceed $5 million, including legal fees and severance. She urged her colleagues to reconsider their stance, advocating for a fair process that would allow Dr. Fagan to address any issues raised against her.

The discussion also touched on the confidentiality of the superintendent's evaluations, with board member Mister Sitton referencing Dr. Fagan's contract and the board's obligations to support her in achieving district goals. He echoed Dixon's concerns about the lack of documented evaluations and meetings to assess Dr. Fagan's performance.

As the board deliberates on this contentious issue, the outcome remains uncertain, with significant implications for the district's leadership and financial resources. The meeting underscored the importance of due process and transparent communication within the board, as members grapple with the decision that could reshape the district's future.