In a recent government meeting, city officials discussed the implications of a state statute that prohibits local governments from banning firearms within designated security zones. This conversation was prompted by inquiries from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel regarding the unusual language surrounding firearms in the context of an upcoming national convention expected to draw between 30,000 to 50,000 attendees.

City representatives expressed concern over the potential for violence and disorder, particularly in light of anticipated protests. One official highlighted the absurdity of allowing loaded firearms while banning less lethal items, such as tennis balls, within the security footprint. In response, the city has drafted a substitute ordinance aimed at prohibiting firearms in this area, despite acknowledging that it may conflict with state law.

The officials noted that while they may face legal challenges, they are prepared to argue that the statute was not intended to apply to the unique circumstances of the convention. They emphasized the need to protect the safety of residents and businesses within the security zone, citing fears from local business owners about the presence of firearms during the event.

The discussion also referenced precedents from previous conventions, noting that Philadelphia successfully prohibited firearms in its security zone, while Cleveland did not, potentially due to differing interpretations of state statutes. The officials concluded that they are willing to challenge the statute in court to advocate for public safety, demonstrating a commitment to addressing the concerns of constituents and local businesses.