Residents of a local community expressed strong opposition to a proposed development during a recent government meeting, citing concerns over noise, animal control, and property values. The discussions highlighted ongoing issues with the current state of the neighborhood, including loud music playing at all hours and free-roaming animals such as pigs, chickens, and goats.

One resident, who has lived in the area since 1987, described the disruptive environment, stating that music often continues late into the night, affecting the quality of life for nearby homeowners. He voiced his fears that the introduction of tiny homes on the property would further diminish property values.

Another speaker, Kevin Strayhorn, who owns a large parcel adjacent to the proposed development, echoed these sentiments. He criticized the current condition of the existing homes on the property, which he described as rundown and poorly managed, and expressed skepticism about the developer's intentions. Strayhorn also raised concerns about the notification process for the development proposal, claiming it was flawed and that many residents were not adequately informed.

Kenneth Pryor, a long-time resident, added to the concerns by questioning the suitability of the land for development, particularly regarding septic system requirements and environmental factors. He emphasized that the area is not conducive to new housing projects.

Carl McClellan, another local resident, shared a personal anecdote about the impact of the free-range animals on his property, illustrating the broader issues of animal control in the neighborhood.

The meeting underscored a collective apprehension among residents regarding the proposed development and its potential impact on their community, with many calling for more stringent oversight and consideration of local concerns before any decisions are made.