Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

AI Talent War Sparks Urgent Call for Ethical Standards

July 23, 2024 | Financial Services: House Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

AI Talent War Sparks Urgent Call for Ethical Standards
In a recent government meeting focused on the future of artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for American workers, key discussions highlighted the urgent need for the U.S. to retain and develop high-skilled tech talent amid a global competition, particularly with countries like China. Participants emphasized the importance of designing AI technologies that reflect American values and ensuring that American workers are equipped with the necessary skills to leverage these advancements in their job functions.

The meeting also addressed concerns regarding the potential for AI systems to produce discriminatory outcomes, even when not intentionally programmed to do so. Congressman Kasten raised the issue of \"disparate impact,\" where non-discriminatory rules can still lead to unequal outcomes for different demographic groups. Legal expert Miss Rice provided clarity on the distinction between \"disparate treatment,\" where individuals are treated differently based on protected characteristics, and \"disparate impact,\" where a neutral policy results in discriminatory effects.

The discussion underscored the legal complexities surrounding AI and discrimination, with Kasten questioning whether companies are implementing code to test for both disparate treatment and impact within their algorithms. Some participants confirmed that they do include such testing, while others noted their companies do not develop algorithms in-house.

The implications of these discussions are significant, especially in light of proposed changes to legal frameworks that could affect how discrimination claims are handled. The meeting concluded with a call for continued vigilance in ensuring that AI technologies are developed responsibly and inclusively, reflecting the diverse fabric of American society.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting