During a recent government meeting, council members engaged in a robust discussion regarding the future of a property previously earmarked for development. The conversation centered around the need for a new procurement process due to the expiration of the current contract and the desire for a more community-focused approach to the property’s use.

Council member Willis emphasized the importance of involving the full council in discussions, particularly given the contentious history surrounding the property. He noted that previous delays were intended to facilitate community meetings, which have since taken place. However, he expressed concerns about the lack of objectivity in the discussions and the need for a broader conversation about potential uses for the property.

Chair Gracie acknowledged the confusion surrounding the project, explaining that initial community feedback indicated a preference for selling the property rather than developing it for permanent supportive housing. She highlighted the need to revamp discussions to include a wider range of community needs, including public safety, recreation, and housing.

Council member Mendelsohn voiced frustration over the ongoing development challenges, arguing that the community has consistently expressed disinterest in the proposed uses for the property. He advocated for selling the land to fund the reopening of another facility, Independence, which has remained vacant since 2022. Mendelsohn stressed the importance of listening to community feedback and moving forward pragmatically.

The meeting concluded with a motion to delay the current contract indefinitely, reflecting the council's intent to reassess the situation and prioritize community engagement in future discussions. The council members underscored the necessity of aligning development plans with the expressed desires of the community, aiming for a more collaborative approach moving forward.