In a recent government meeting, city officials debated the future of a property previously used as a hospital, with discussions centering on its potential sale to address the ongoing housing crisis. The proposal to demolish the hospital and repurpose the land for much-needed housing was met with mixed reactions from council members.

One council member emphasized the urgency of the situation, highlighting that the property was purchased with 2017 bond proceeds specifically allocated for permanent supportive housing. They argued that selling the property would allow the city to move forward with plans to develop housing on a nearby site, which has seen increasing activity and demand.

However, the motion to sell the property faced opposition. Some council members expressed concerns about the costs associated with maintaining the vacant property and criticized the city’s track record in property development. They argued that the city should allow the private market to take over, suggesting that selling the property could expedite development and alleviate financial burdens related to security and maintenance.

Another council member advocated for a more strategic approach, proposing to wait for expert advice on optimizing the sale to ensure the best outcome for taxpayers. This perspective highlighted the importance of thorough planning before proceeding with the sale.

Ultimately, the vote on the amendment to sell the property failed, leading to further discussions on the original motion. The meeting underscored the complexities of addressing housing needs while managing city resources effectively, with officials grappling with the balance between immediate action and strategic planning.