During a recent government meeting, officials discussed the need for a clear line of succession in the event that both the mayor and the mayor pro tempore are unable to serve. This topic arose from concerns that the current ordinance and charter do not adequately address such scenarios, leaving a potential gap in leadership.

Committee member Mister Head presented a chart compiled by an administrative intern, which outlined various succession practices from other cities. The discussion highlighted that under Robert's Rules of Order, if both the mayor and mayor pro tempore are unavailable, the council must select a presiding officer for the meeting. However, this does not confer any mayoral powers to that individual.

The committee explored the idea of establishing a more comprehensive succession plan that extends beyond just the mayor and mayor pro tempore. Head noted that while many cities follow a similar protocol, some, like Independence, Kansas City, and Overland Park, have implemented different approaches. For instance, Independence's succession plan includes council members based on seniority, while Kansas City has a detailed list that includes committee chairs, mirroring the federal government's succession hierarchy.

The committee's discussions underscored the importance of having a robust succession plan to ensure continuity of governance during emergencies, suggesting that a more structured approach could enhance the city's preparedness for unforeseen circumstances.