During a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the use of surveillance cameras by the Flock system and their impact on community safety. A member of the committee commended local law enforcement for their ongoing efforts to enhance safety but emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in the use of surveillance technology.

The discussion highlighted critical issues surrounding data control and the effectiveness of the Flock system. It was noted that the data collected by these cameras is not under the control of local authorities, raising questions about privacy and the potential for misuse. The committee member pointed out that there have been instances of erroneous stops made by the system, which further complicates the narrative around its reliability.

A call for metrics to evaluate the success of the surveillance system was made, with specific inquiries about which crime statistics should be monitored to assess its effectiveness. The member expressed skepticism about the system's ability to reduce crime, citing a lack of independent studies or verifiable evidence to support claims of its efficacy. The refusal of Flock to allow an independent body to evaluate their operations was particularly concerning, as it leaves a gap in objective evidence regarding the system's impact on crime rates.

The meeting underscored the need for a balanced approach to surveillance, with an emphasis on understanding the broader implications of such technology on community trust and safety. As discussions continue, the committee is expected to seek further clarity on the operational metrics and accountability measures associated with the Flock system.