Residents expressed strong opposition during a recent government meeting regarding a proposed high-density apartment development in their neighborhood. One local resident, who identified himself as living on a ten-acre estate nearby, criticized the plan as the worst he had seen, claiming it lacked proper consideration for the surrounding community. He asserted that no residents had approved the plan and voiced concerns about the potential impact on traffic and local infrastructure, particularly with an estimated 2,000 vehicles expected to enter and exit the area.

The resident highlighted a perceived disconnect between city staff and the community, suggesting that the staff report seemed to favor the developer rather than address the concerns of local residents. He emphasized that the city should prioritize the needs of its taxpayers and ensure that development aligns with the community's interests. He also questioned the rationale behind changing zoning regulations when existing zoning could accommodate development without such drastic measures.

Another speaker, Brook Williams, echoed these sentiments, urging the council to consider the environmental implications of rezoning over 100 acres of land. Williams pointed out that the name \"Inver Grove Heights\" reflects a commitment to growth and preservation of green spaces, which could be compromised by the proposed development.

City officials clarified that the meeting's focus was primarily on zoning changes as part of a broader comprehensive plan aimed at future development through 2040. They acknowledged the importance of community feedback but reiterated that the current discussion was limited to land use and zoning adjustments.

The meeting underscored the tension between development goals and community concerns, with residents calling for more transparency and engagement in the planning process.