Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Election integrity concerns rise as precincts excluded from review

July 23, 2024 | Plymouth, Hennepin County, Minnesota



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Election integrity concerns rise as precincts excluded from review
In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the lack of transparency in the post-election review process for Plymouth, Minnesota, highlighting that none of the 23 precincts were included in the 2020 and 2023 reviews. This absence raises concerns about the integrity of the electoral process, particularly as the state mandates a minimum of only 3% of precincts to be randomly selected for review.

The meeting revealed that approximately 75% of absentee ballots in 2020 originated from Plymouth, with a total of 38,000 out of 51,000 ballots cast by mail. At the state level, 700,000 absentee ballots were reported missing 25 days after the election, indicating discrepancies between certified totals and the statewide voter registration system. Although these issues were addressed by the Secretary of State's office, the discussions underscored a growing demand for more rigorous auditing practices.

One speaker emphasized the need for an expanded post-election review, suggesting that Plymouth should aim to include more precincts in future audits. He referenced other cities, such as Oak Grove and Ramsey, which have successfully expanded their reviews to cover more precincts and races. The speaker proposed that the council consider a workshop to explore these options further.

Concerns about the chain of custody for ballots were also raised, with calls for bipartisan oversight to ensure the security of ballots from the time they are cast until they are counted. The meeting concluded with a commitment to further discussions on enhancing the post-election review process, reflecting a community interest in ensuring electoral integrity.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI