In a recent government meeting, lawmakers discussed a bipartisan bill aimed at banning animal testing in the cosmetics industry in Ohio. The proposed legislation, House Bill 495, seeks to prohibit the sale of cosmetics that have been newly tested on animals, aligning with similar federal efforts under the Humane Cosmetics Act.

Representative Carruthers, a key proponent of the bill, emphasized the inhumane nature of animal testing, describing it as outdated and unnecessary. She highlighted the cruel practices involved, where small animals are subjected to painful tests, often resulting in severe injuries or death. Carruthers argued that advancements in technology have provided effective non-animal testing alternatives, such as lab-grown tissue samples and computer modeling, which are already being utilized by many companies in the industry.

The bill would only apply to new products tested after its enactment, leaving existing products unaffected. It includes exemptions for non-cosmetic testing related to significant human health concerns. Notably, the legislation has garnered support from the Personal Care Products Council, representing 90% of American cosmetic companies, many of which have already ceased animal testing.

If passed, Ohio would join 12 other states that have enacted similar bans, contributing to a growing global movement against animal testing in cosmetics, which has already been outlawed in 45 countries. The bill aims to provide consumers with clearer choices in the cosmetic market, addressing the confusion surrounding animal testing practices and promoting cruelty-free products.