Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

House committee debates controversial bills amid heated testimony

June 04, 2024 | Civil Justice, House of Representatives, Committees, Legislative, Ohio



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House committee debates controversial bills amid heated testimony
The June 4, 2024, meeting of the Civil Justice Committee saw significant discussions surrounding House Bill 178 and House Bill 504, with amendments and testimonies shaping the legislative landscape.

Chair Hillier opened the session, confirming a quorum and moving swiftly to the voting agenda. The committee reviewed House Bill 178, which underwent an amendment (2198) that limits the Crown Act's oversight to public schools, excluding private institutions. This amendment received support from committee members, including Representatives Callender and Brent, and was passed with a majority vote of 9 to 3. The bill will now proceed with the amendment incorporated, pending further harmonization by the Legislative Service Commission.

The committee also addressed House Bill 504, which was in its third hearing. Testimony was provided by Shawn Harris, a past president of the Ohio Association for Justice, who voiced opposition to the bill. Harris raised concerns about potential confusion and discord it could create for Ohio motorists and future victims of drunk driving. He emphasized the need for further discussions to address the issues raised by the bill.

The meeting concluded with a reminder for members to sign the roll before leaving, as the roll would remain open until 1:30 PM. The discussions highlighted the committee's ongoing efforts to refine legislation impacting education and public safety in Ohio.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Ohio articles free in 2025

https://workplace-ai.com/
https://workplace-ai.com/